In the past (1996 and 2003) teams boycotted matches due to security concerns (eg Australia, Sri Lanka). However, Pakistan is boycotting matches in Sri Lanka, which is a neutral venue, so there is no reason for government intervention. Therefore, this action is in direct violation of the ICC Constitution.In the past (1996 and 2003) teams boycotted matches due to security concerns (eg Australia, Sri Lanka). However, Pakistan is boycotting matches in Sri Lanka, which is a neutral venue, so there is no reason for government intervention. Therefore, this action is in direct violation of the ICC Constitution.

In the past (1996 and 2003) teams boycotted matches due to security concerns (eg Australia, Sri Lanka). However, Pakistan is boycotting matches in Sri Lanka, which is a neutral venue, so there is no reason for government intervention. Therefore, this action is in direct violation of the ICC Constitution.



Source link